Just a friendly reminder, Don’t share personal info with MGTOW’s or MRA’s…

Okay, for most of you, I am probably stating the obvious….

Don’t share anything further than a throwaway email with any of these guys…

Any site that asks for anything more than a throwaway email is a red flag in my opinion and you will not find “secret knowledge.”

Don’t share first names (well, I suppose if it is as common as John you are fine) and most certainly do not share last names.

If you are not using proxies, your “general location” is available by IP address.  You can measure the security risk that you find acceptable.

Especially don’t share information with MGTOW groupies.  These are individuals posing as women (may or may not be.)  They will ask for extremely personal information such as virginity (or age when lost,) face pictures or more.  They are experts at faking sympathy.  They are, in my estimation one of three groups:

1.) Sociopaths digging for personal information so they can doxx and humiliate low status men with the intent to destroy their personal lives and/or drive them to suicide.  (If you don’t think such people exist, go over to manboobs and read some of the comments, they are out there.)

2.) Bizzarre women with a very specific fetish for a very specific type of man.  Perhaps “virgin chasers” in the case of incels or some MGTOW.  Ultimately, these women will be more destructive than hiring a prostitute even in areas where it is illegal.  My recommendation is to avoid at all costs.  To see a real life example, google Eurasian Tiger Persephone.  (She targets lonely Eurasian men but the concept is the same.)

3.) Narcissistic women who want lonely/thirsty men to pay attention to them with no reciprocation.  Do not fall prey to these games.

Also avoid any “meet ups.”  With the rise of corrupt political organizations such as the Southern Poverty Center and mass school shootings, it is not paranoid to suggest that you could wind up on a Federal Watch list just for going to a “MGTOW meeting.”  Look how scumbags like Hugo Schwyzer tried to compare an interest in men’s rights to a sicko like Anders Breivik.  Suffice to say, if you know anyone who is involved with the Antifa or Alt-Right, best to cut these individuals out of your life like the cancer they are.  You would gain nothing positive from the association and may even lose a job or risk being mugged by a “vigilante.”

Also, if you have a site, better to use a free version with limited functionality than buying a domain name or paying for additional functionality with a credit card.  Remember, nothing more than a throw away email and try to avoid authentication tied to a cell phone.  Avoid gmail if you can and don’t watch Youtube videos while logged in as they are collecting highly private information.  If you must use gmail, it is best used on a computer that you never use your thowaway email on.  Think of compartmentalizing this as a work computer vs personal computer.  As a normy would try not to look at porn on the work computer, treat this the same way with the computer you use your throwaway on. I believe that at this point in history, corrupt tech companies such as Google and Facebook are a bigger threat to male sovereignty than the NSA.

 

 

….have you ever walked out of an interview…

I was wasting time on Quora and came across this…

https://archive.is/kSt5Y

Okay, if it wasn’t written by a brown skinned dude, I bet all the “Jack Donovan taught me about masculinity” alt-right buggers would be posting this everywhere.  Lovish Puniani would be the new James Damore if the alt-reich was color blind and intellectually honest.  But they score the same as feminists when it comes to identity politics. I don’t know much about Indian Culture (Advocatus, dude, help me out here) but it looks like the fart faces at Google India are intolerant about “freedom of religion.”  Does India have a constitution similar to the US?

Here is the meat and potatoes…

This femanazi asked what would be illegal questions in the US regarding this fellow’s religious beliefs…

She asked few more questions and then came the deciding question, she asked me – “Are you religious?”
I said “not too much but I do attend family ceremonies.” She asked – “Do you pray?” I replied – “Yes not always but I do when I visit the temple, usually, I meditate
She asked “to whom do you pray?” I replied – “toKrishna
Here the weird bitter look on her face was back and she spoke in a terrifying bitter voice – “But Krishna was a huge casanova, he had affairs with different Gopis, he used to be with a different gopi every other day. He had 3600 wives. How do you say you are a feminist when you pray to such a women player.
The guy kept his integrity and walked out of the interview for the cesspool of intolerance known as google…

…state’s right’s, homeless sexpats and other trippy shit…

Okay, you’ve probably seen many, many, many libertarian tough guys, er I mean MGTOW, err I mean MRA’s, err I mean Real Men ™ non-mangina true alpha’s like Aaron Clarey and Berniepoops Chapin whine about “state’s right’s.”

Now, it is a liberal they like to call Pocahontas who is urging for states rights…

http://www.newsweek.com/elizabeth-warren-marijuana-legislation-states-782784

Have I been smoking too much shit to see what was going on in this little flipperoo???

Don’t those manuresphere tough guys say it is the left impinging on state’s rights and personal freedom????

Now I am ambivalent on drug legalization.  Ideologically, I am 100% for drug legalization.  But in my personal life, I have actually gotten in way more trouble with legal drugs than street shit.  I’m sure you guys want to hear the tale(s) -but I don’t feel like bragging, um, revealing my “user notches.”  I’m not some insecure Roosh V type in regards to fist fights, puking, being handcuffed (not S&M,) blackouts, “sobering centers” and all this other sordid shit.  I don’t need to tell you what I do remember so you can buy my e-books or whatever.  So I guess this is similar to my feelings on prostitution.  It should be legal because the gov’t shouldn’t be dictating morality but even if it is legal, you are probably better off starting a 401k or buying a new video game system than handing over half your paycheck to some broad that thinks you are a walking, talking sack of shit.

Now here is a must watch video that gets started on the 3 minute mark:

Do all the manuresphere guys tell ya that the addictions that drew you to another country could drag you down?  Whether it is sex, drugs, alcohol, they can own you like nothing else.  It is only your own hubris when you don’t realize that the demon within can overtake you.  Do you think Roosh V will ever tell you the dangers of sex tourism when he’s got books to sell?  MGTOW?MRA types will tell you all day long how marriage can destroy a man.  And while that is 100% true, there are 38,936,210,021 other paths to self-destruction.  Why don’t they talk about that?  Afraid of cutting in to some sociopathic PUA’s book sales?

Oh, and for the trippy shit…

Hope this qualifies…

Oprah for Prez in 2020???????

You’ve probably heard the rumors…

But if it is crazy having celebrities like Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jesse Ventura and Donald Trump as politicians–why couldn’t Oprah be successful?

…this is interesting…

 

Oprah is a huge advocate of a scammy book called The Secret.  The Law of Attraction?  Fake it to make it? Gee, sounds like that scammy stuff manurespherians call “game.”  I bet allot of PUA’s read that book.

She’s also a huge advocate of Tony Robbins. Well, ya might wanna read up on The Syndicate.

She is also a huge fan of Dr. Oz. Heck, Dr. Oz seems even scammier than crazy Alex Jones with all his supplements. Yeah, we all know how sleazy dudes like mike Cernovich are total Trumpkins.  We could bet on slimy Jenny McCarthy to shill for Oprah in 2020.

Oh, well, guess we don’t get the politicians we need, just the politicians we deserve.

…hustle and upsell…

…so I came across this video on Youtube…

Now this woman is an expert at sales…

She has her, um (most likely surgically enhanced) well, let’s just say, assets…

Notice how she upsells him into a more expensive show…

Then when he comes back, she tries to upsell him again…

She demands extra money…

She  then offers him a towel/klennex (“Clean up in isle 4, hehe…)

She then tries to tell him to go to the bank so he can get more…

This is all hustle and upsell…

And since this is in Germany, ain’t that where Ziggy Stardusk lives?  I  wonder how much of his e-begged money he dropped at this joint. Does he invite his buddy Barbarabroski to tag along?

And I wouldn’t be surprised if this is a cash only business and this broad is getting bennies from the state while making a ton of money…

 

MGTOW 2.0 has failed us…

By my reasoning, the libertarian/trad con’s who wrote the MGTOW Manifesto would be MGTOW 1.0. Barbarabrowski, Ziggy Stardusk and (Enter the) Sandman would be MGTOW 2.0.  I am obviously leaving allot of people out.  But I think it is fair to say that those guys failed us.

We can point out how Barbarabrowski took the money and ran when it came to his Miggytau bookypoops.  We can point out how Ziggy Stardusk and so many other  so-called MGTOW sound allot like the Alt-Reich with their cries “The muzzies are cummin’, the muzzies are cummin’…” We can all laugh at (Enter the) Sandman’s silly Youtube vids.

In my mind, there are two prominent reasons that are connected to the failure of MGTOW 2.0.  #1) Monetization of content & #2) a refusal to distance themselves from the manuresphere.  I believe these two reasons cross over….

After many MGTOW made it clear that they didn’t want to work with Elam’s AVfM and after doxxings advocated by Aaron Clarey, it seemed logical that the next step for these guys would be to divorce themselves from the manureshere.  There were many reasons to do this.  According to “red pilled” PUA’s, MGTOW’s were pathetic incel virgins who couldn’t get laid in a whorehouse with a hand full of hundreds.  With friends like that, who needs enemies?  It would seem logical that after the doxxing, these MGTOW’s would say “Adios, manuresphere.”

That leads me to the next point, when you are trying to monetize something, you need a customer base.  Who better than a bunch of guys who buy “nootropics” and get rich quick books?  It would be easy for MGTOW 2.0 to tell off the manuresphere if they didn’t need customers.  But since they need customers, they stay tethered to the manuresphere:Screen shot 2017-03-26 at 12.22.14 PM

Yes, Barbarossaa who was doxxed, not by a big, meanie feminist but by the behest of manosphere big wig Aaron Clarey still considers himself part of the manosphere.  I left the manosphere behind when I saw it for what it was.  It was easy for me to do.  I have commentors but no customer base.  If a commentor leaves, maybe a new one appears but I don’t have to sacrifice my dignity and say things I don’t believe to “close a deal.”  Barbarabrowski, how much abuse do you need to take before you leave those fools behind?  Oh, why am I even asking, it’s not like I’m dealing with an individual with integrity.  e-Beg for money for your book.  Then dissappear.  You were cut from the same cloth as those guys.  Or maybe, I am insulting those guys.  Heh, Clarey and Forney DO have books for sale.  They may be awful, but they are available.

This is where I suspect I might get a stray comment or two.  But what about the MGTOW on reddit?  What about the guys who found good advice?  This is where I say we must distinguish between a simple philosophy (don’t get married, don’t cohabitate with women) and personalities trying to make a quick buck and get e-celebrity.  I suppose a man may have found actionable advice on a forum or on the occasional youtube video.  But he didn’t need to drop cash on someone’s patreon (hatreon?) page for it.

Happy New Years!!!!

and, uh, I just couldn’t help this dig against, hehe, Sandman…

 

2017 Reading List…

Got the chance to sit down and read a few books this year…

Now before anyone gets “triggered,” a few are books recommended by Jordan Peterson.  I read some of the things he recommended because they relate to things that interest me and I feel it might be easier to refute some of the things he says if I better understand the framework from which he is arguing….

Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky.  Of everything I read this year, this was the most challenging. It probably didn’t help that I read a translation from the 1800’s.  I slogged through this and it wasn’t until I got past the halfway point that I found much enjoyment in it.  I viewed this book as an answer to the idea of Nietzschean ethics where a “master morality” can justify the unjustifiable.  The “protagonist” is wracked with guilt (shown as illness verging on madness.)

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury.  This was the most enjoyable read of all the books I read this year. I polished it off quick, too.  Bradbury explores ideas about censorship because of the desire not to hurt/offend someone. In this novel, firemen burn books and people consume information via television. It talks about technology dumbing down ideas.  I’m not sure that this is exactly how things play out in the real world, but maybe so with Twitter.

Ordinary Men by Christopher Browning.  I found this book interesting because I had read about the Millgram experiments a few years back.  I had also read a gruesome book, On Killing before this.  Perhaps for those interested in ideas like compliance or with an avid interest in WWII, this would be a worthy read.

The Road to Wigan Pier by George Orwell.  Yes, the George Orwell who wrote Animal Farm.  This book is in two parts.  The first part describes the difficult conditions of the British working class, specifically coal miners.  It also touches upon the fact that class isn’t just about money as some working class men earn more than George Orwell was earning as a writer.  The second part of the book is actually more interesting.  It is highly critical of socialists of the time and alludes to the fact that many don’t actually care about the working class, they just hate hose richer than themselves.  This made me think of feminist’s that don’t actually care about women and MGTOW/MRA’s that equally don’t care about men.  For those that stop by at my blog, this would be a book I’d recommend checking out if you haven’t already.

The Painted Bird by Jerzy Kosiński.  This is a psychadelic horror novel, if you will.  There are graphic descriptions of violence that have the campiness of a low budget horror movie.  Either you like this sort of thing or you don’t.

The Scarlett Gospels by Clive Barker.  It’s been years since I read his stuff.  I’d say this was a decent read but didn’t draw me in the way I was into his stuff in the old days.  I don’t know if I’ve changed or Clive changed.  It just didn’t grip me that much though it was still a decent read.

The Ocean at the End of the Lane by Niel Gaiman.  Much like Clive Barker, I’ve read a few things by Niel years back.  Just like the last Barker book, this was a decent read but didn’t grip me, like say, The Anansi Boys did.   Again, IDK if the authors changed or if I’ve changed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I lost my focus….

I was supposed to be cleaning my base of operations…

unearthed the PS2…

 

 

oh, well, time spent playing video games is way better than real life interaction with MGTOW’s, feminists or the Alt Reich…

…messy room youtube ladies…

Okay, so I’ve thought that someone like Cappity Capitalism imbibing hard liquor and smoking ceegars in vids showed a lack of awareness on his part.  Is someone who can hardly moderate their alcoholism someone you would take advice from?  We don’t see Matt Forney or David Futrelle scarfing down a cheezeburger and washing it down with some Mt. Dew.  I’m sure they would like too, but they don’t.  They know they would be harshly mocked. I suppose Cappy thinks he might be mocked for his alcoholism but still drinks like a fish because it eschews some 1950’s “libertarian tough guy” idea of “manliness.”

I’ve noticed several Youtube ladies will show vids from their messy bedrooms. Now, my first thought was they lack basic self awareness.  There are still thirsty men throwing themselves at these ladies.  In many cases they could easily ether get the clothes (“dirty undies”) off the floor or just face the camera towards a wall and hide the disaster of their living space.  I even think that oldschool rad-fems who wouldn’t wear make-up or other “tools of the patriarchy” would at least give us a clean looking room or workspace.  I think, that perhaps these ladies see their persentation as some new kind of femininity whereas someone like Cappity see’s his presentation as some kind of masculinity.   This new femininity is “too good” too cook or clean.  Not even for a man but for one’s self.  It seems like the “fat acceptance movement”-“Accept me as I am, you are the one with the problem, how dare you have standards.”

Star Wars…

yup, I saw it…

…yup, the manuresphere guys will cry that Disney is “cucking” them with non-white characters…

…yup, I just contradicted my previous post by saying “cuck.”  (even if it was to describe the manuresphere.)

…yup, Snokes is a bad dude…