so it occurred to me that “mosh” is most likely a Yiddish word. Haha, if you are a member of that alt-rite you will be able to do disgusting things like become “blood brothers” with Jagoff Donovan whilst listening to Screwdriver but you will not be able to go near a mosh pit.
If you are aultreich, trigger warning, do no proceed any further because you will be exposed to Yiddish…
I wonder if Andrew Anglin and all the other limpwrists from Stormfag would like this?
Ooops, looks like the womyn of Stormfart already discussed this inbetween feMRA Judgy bitch ranting than more men needed to die in war while womyn sit home baking cookies.
So, in many “men’s spaces,” you hear endless talk about “gynocentrism.” When many Alt-Righter’s wander over to these spaces, they talk about the “virtues” of “European Culture.” In “European Culture,” things such as chivalry and marriage are promoted. These things are inherently “gynocentric,” so, I suppose you could enjoy listening to Mozart, but why would you want to “save” “European Culture.” It becomes clear to me (and I may be guilty of reductionist black and white thinking) that if something is rotten, it should be thrown out. If a man is interested in self sovereignty, why would he be so attached to a broken system???
…more and more it is clear I *am not* part of your “movement”….
…so keep crying about muzzies destroying yeropeon kulture, womyn loving thugs and not edjamacated “fit” “men” “who know more than everyone else ™ ,” HBD, phrenology, tarrot cards and how it’s bigotry to call out Jagoff Donovan and Milo Yianopoopooplous for their anti-male tirades disguised as “telling it like it is” with a lisp…
So, unfortunately, awhile back a charlatan of the level I have not seen since the days of “Clarence in Baltimore” showed up at Mr. Blackpill’s place. He attacked people and rambled on about Sigmund Freud. He bragged about his peer reviewed papers, then linked to white nationalist Jack Donovan. Why would a sane person link to Jack Donovan???
My theory is that he thought he could shut down argument and use cheap shots. Why would anyone try to look alpha when there aren’t any womyn around to impress, wait he did link to Donovan, hint, hint. Alright, now I am taking cheap shots like he did. But I couldn’t help being my asshole self and leave this funny meme…
haha, it wasn’t even a personal attack, but his method of response, not trying to justify why he had linked to someone like Donovan but attacking my lack of status was telling:
“Here’s goony Jack Donovan; but he’s in a suit, before what I assume to be a crowd of people who paid to listen to him read one of his bizarro white nationalist papers
Not that this is any great accomplishment to us normal folks. We have to do things in suits, before crowds. (It’s called being productive).
When has “stonerwithaboner” been in this position? I’m guessing… never.”
Now the irony of attacking a man’s status when that man (me) refers to himself as a “low status male” is somewhat comparable to going to a fat acceptance blog and saying whassup fatties. If it’s an attempt to insult, it falls flat because this is the place such “insults” are torn to pieces. This troll’s quite frankly womanly behavior continued. When one commentator said he no longer wished to engage the troll, (s)he condescendingly wrote a blog post and egged that commentator on for a response. My response was to say that he was only doing this to create a double bind whereas if the commentator doesn’t respond he will be attacked for being a coward and if he does respond, the troll would have some of his info for doxx.
The troll responded thusly…
“Dear Kooky stonerwithaboner:
…if you don’t respond, he will call you an intellectual coward, if you do respond, he will have your ip address and email info for doxxing purposes…
Xxxxxxxx has already disagreed with me on my blog. If your delusions of grandeur were realistic, the Freudians would already be at the poor guy’s house to abduct him.
I’ll let you get back to discussing your Jewish conspiracies and pretending you’re important enough to “doxx” now.
Best,
Now we can see two things, first, I may not be important enough to doxx, but I was saying that he might the other gentleman, not myself. It is this dishonest sleigh off hand that seems to be this troll’s forte. The second thing was accusing me of “Jewish Conspiracies.” I wonder where he pulled that out of, his ass perhaps? In fact, if you do click on the link the troll provided, you will find his response to the previous gentleman: “Good catch! There is the truth, and then there is effective propaganda. I never claimed to be a perfectly honest man. I strive to effect change.“
This sleazeball seems to operate under the same rules as a male feminist like David Futrelle.
Then I saw another commentator, who has commented on my blog reference a discussion we were having here:
It is evident I did not steal a thing from this troll. In fact in the discussion with the previous commentator, it is mentioned that I wrote the blog post because of a previous discussion I had had with him and because of how I saw a “progressive/liberal” trash another man at the faux-pro-male Feminist Critics blog.
Now I have left the two commentator’s names out because there is no point dragging their names through the mud. The only reason I pointed out the dishonesty of the troll is because such low calibre characters need to be spotted and called out ASAP whenever men are having a discussion. Pointing out their tactics is a good way to fight them.
Now, this seems like a funny way to “engage” the troll…
I’m no fan of Alex Jones but I think the above video is funny. And I think calling out trolls then leaving silly Youtube videos after their comments is the best way to deal with them. Just like the best way to deal with nazi’s like Jack Donovan is silly meme’s they would find insulting. They aren’t worth an “intellectual” arguement. Remember it’s already been tried with feminists and proven pointless…
He’s really saying he can’t have the kind of sex he would like with a partner he finds attractive…
If this sounds strange, let me draw an analogy…
…if someone says she can’t find work…
She really saying she can’t find a job with wages she finds fair and work/working conditions she finds at the very least tolerable…
If you peruse job ads online you might see $Telemarketing$ jobs. They might vaguely say base vs. draw. They might say ba$e pay then commi$$ion only. If you were to actually send over a resume, you might get invited to an interview in a windowless building in a not great part of town. You might see some dejected souls, err, 6 figure earners puffing on smokes in the makeshift “break area.” You might be a bit surprised when you find out it is a group interview. After thirty minutes of “Smile and Dial, Fake it too Make it, The Sky’s the Limit and Attitude Is Everything” you still realize you don’t know what the company sells nor do you understand the “pay structure.” You are then instructed to fill out a survey online before 12:01 AM, great now come on in on Monday for training. Is training paid you may sheepishly enquire?
“–What, wha, don’t worry about that, coffee is for closers, real men get laid and closers get paid. Otherwise hit the streets jack. Join a fucking union if you want to sit on your but and collect a check, it’s even better than welfare or so I hear…”
Well, if this was your choice for work, might you not continue to peruse the want ads until something, shall we say, a little better came along?
If you live anywhere near a big city, there is probably a sex club. And there are most likely private parties whether they are held at residences or in hotels. Might take a while to figure out the “code,” if it says “all inclusive,” don’t get too scared when a Jagoff Donovan type fella in a dress tells you “gendar is a social construct, let’s get a room sweetie.” And BBW isn’t a variation on BMW. BBC is not the British Broadcasting Channel, though you will meet many members of the Alt-Rite, for ahem field studies regarding HBD. But let’s just say for argument’s sake that you push through your anxieties. You drive on over and pay the exorbitant “door fee.” Maybe you feel most comfortable telling tales and guzzling nasty beer with the gruff jarhead as a few people couple off. Maybe the slightly strange broad with the model like physique and busted face invites several guys to one of the rooms. Do you follow to see if you may partake at what may unfold? Maybe you find yourself talking to a chain smoking woman at least 15 years your senior. You think she’s not in half bad shape for her age. She brushes up against your arm and let’s you know she is open to the idea of going to a room “but NOTHING happens without my husband.”
You might find what you are looking for at one of these parties or you might have too keep looking. Perhaps being dudebroe #24 when empowered feminist womyn has her sex pozzie gangbang might not be on your list of life goals to accomplish. You might be able to get laid, but…
Here’s the problem….
…if you are a low status male…
…just like the unemployed person is sick of hearing how employers face a “labor shortage”….
…you’re likely not very happy to hear womyn face a shortage of “good men”…
…you may be able to get laid but it might mean compromising your principles…
…you might feel weird at “paying for sex.”
…you might feel weird “hitting a woman” because 50 shades or some other bullshit…
…you might feel weird at “group sex” because maybe the only cock you wanna see is your own…
However, society will either expect you to “man up” or quietly endure celibacy. If you complain you will be told you are “entitled” and that you have unrealistic expectations…
Well, have you noticed creepsters like Aaron Sleazy and Stardusk using rhetoric that gets closer and closer to Roosh V each day? Maybe they were always closet racists and now they feel “empowered” to cum on out. Or maybe they are snake oil salesmen who see a growing movement and will say anything to close a deal. They likely saw Roosh V and Aaron Clarey selling a defective product but instead of being called out, sales grew as they embraced the alt-rite. Well…
You can read about a womyn’s experience with “cuddle therapy.” It brings up some (nuanced) points that get glossed over when people talk about prostitution. She feels icky “paying 4 it.” Something that should be free, cuddles, hugs, physical intimacy, she is now using the free market to put a price tag on. I suppose she doesn’t feel icky paying for someone to work on her car because it requires skills she may not know and may not be interested in learning. She probably doesn’t feel icky paying for a pizza because someone has to get the ingredients and make the thing. Heck, she might not even feel icky about a so-called sports massage, y’know the ones where they actually can name muscle groups and not those weird places with the flickering lights and bars on the window. Because even then, a skilled individual is working hard to get knotts out of her muscles.
She talks about being afraid to hire a man for this service because, presumably, she doesn’t want to let someone bigger and stronger into her living space. I could cry “misandry, misandry” but since I’m not an M(h)RA weirdo like Dean Esmay, I’ll just say it’s understandable that she wouldn’t.
But here are the choice quotes that talk about “paying 4 it”–
” After I picked a time and date and received a confirmation, I then surrendered my AmEx number-for a second, it did feel a little dirty.”
“When our session is up and the $80 exchanges hands, I feel as if I’ve paid for a service that falls somewhere between therapy and a one-night stand. There’s still uncertainty and searching and the stirrings of an internal shift, maybe, but when I’m on the street, there’s overwhelmingly something else: the memory of someone holding me whom I held in return. I know human touch is important. I know that this is therapeutic. But for me, for now, it’s just not the same.”
Why is this so interesting? Because whenever prostitution is talked about, men are expected to “pay 4 it” without feeling dehumanized in the process. It’s all about the woman’s agency or how she might be coerced, or how she really doesn’t want to do it but the sweatshop paying 10 cents an hour wouldn’t hire her. Manosphere guys talk about prostitution being a simple answer between “inequalities” between the sexes. It isn’t, brah, it isn’t…
Someone being shutdown for wrong doing IS NOT limiting free speech…
One the first part, you mighta heard about a creepster creeping on gay Olympians…
Now on the second part, you probably heard about Milo Y’s publicity stunts that he claims were limiting his free speech… But let’s get real here, for an opportunistic narcissistic creature like Milo, the only bad press is no press. He gets to play vyctym and his fanboize chant louder and louder he got a raw deal, brah.
Okay, tough guy, as a low status male, I don’t have much dog in the fight between so-called left wingers and right wingers. They both look down upon me as a worthless piece of shit. So I’ll hold them both to the same standard.
Now you mighta heard about Gawker’s troubles. And much like misguided Milo, some are trying to misappropriate free speech. If a corporate platform behaves badly and opens itself up to legal action, this is not a case of free speech. This sounds like the “too big to fail” bullshit we heard circa 2008. Ironically, Nick Denton, a gay treated another gay man badly yet I’m the fucking homophobe because I wouldn’t want to be stuck in an elevator with liquored up, lipsy Milo Yiannopoulos. If Peter Theil felt wronged by the sleazetastic forces at Gawker and found it worthy to back another man, Hulk Hogan who was also wronged, the only unfair part to this story is that poor men such as myself don’t have such recourse against the mistreatment they must endure. But the nutjob liberals will still tell me to “check my privilege.”
Not that this is any great accomplishment to us normal folks. We have to do things in suits, before crowds. (It’s called being productive).
When has “stonerwithaboner” been in this position? I’m guessing… never.”