…a little bit of gratitude…

…I was due to get some money back from O’Bombya…

…so the postman screwed up…

…and apparently the check did not wind up in my box…

…well, someone slipped the envelope under my door…

…whomever you are, Thanks!!!

…here’s a new old song for ya…

….a unified theory of gender, sexuality, the universe and everything….

…I’ve got it, finally–JUST ONE UNIFIED THEORY THAT EXPLAINS THE COMPLEXITY OF ALL HUMANITY IN A FEW PARAGRAPHS. This will end all debates over apexsexuality, patriarchy, hegemonic masculinity, objectification, male disposability, female hypergamy, the rationalization hampster, pansexuality, tri- (try?) sexuality, the differences between polyamory, polygamy, open relationships and plain just fcuking around…

…maybe you are rolling your eyes…

….or maybe you are thinking stonerwithaboner got his hands on some really good shrooms–I wish…

…..or maybe you are thinking that the dirty ole MGTOW finally got laid with an HB 9.823612, and because of all those years pent up frustration, gave her orgasm after earth shattering orgasm. So much so she even gave him $$$ afterwords. Now, he only thinks he has a unified theory because of all those endorphins and that six pack of IPA… Haha, well that didn’t happen either so I guess all the macho Alpha’s like Roosh, Paul Elam and Hugo Schwyzer will continue to call me a bitter, small penised, basement dwelling virgin with no fears of a Napster sized lawsuit.

alright, so I am being a bit dramatic. The only true thing so far is the IPA’s but that’s neither here nor there…

…and I kept you waiting this far just as a shit test to see if you have any patience…

…y’know, why I wanted to see if you have any patience? Cause I didn’t want you to go apeshit on me…

…so if you are still reading….

…maybe you should stop if you are easily offended…

–Last Chance–

I don’t have a Unified Theory–and, sacrilege of all sacrilege’s–I doubt anyone else does either.

…so on this edge of the genderspere we’ve argued that feminist’s theories of patriarchy have flaws such as the apex fallacy and accuse men of having privileges that many do not have. How the fuck does Mandy Marcotte know what it’s like being a low status (cis hetero) male who whilst being in decent shape can’t even get a womyn his age to look at him (much less a date.) Where the hell does a feminist get the right to tell me that I’m not allowed to feel oppressed –because sexism doesn’t disempower the systematically powerful gender– signing up for Selective Service at 18 when my ass was literally potentially on the line if the powers that be decided they needed more hu(man) cattle for their oil wars operation freedom? It just seems that telling me I’m privileged is a silencing tactic. A way to say that my feelings don’t matter for a pile of shit. If that is not dehumanizing, and dare I say objectifying, I don’t know what is. That seems worse than some random guy fapping to a dog eared porno mag in my book…

…now I’ve read/watched videos presenting gender theories by Typhon Blue and Girl Writes What. I thought they were interesting but somehow not really gratifying. Like drinking O’Douls when you really wanted to put on a buzz but were trying to be a good boy. The taste was almost, almost there but something just wasn’t authentic. I wanted to sign up because it was a nice counter-theory… it… just… didn’t… somehow.. feel… right…

I couldn’t quite place my finger on it, it part of the reason why I couldn’t become an MRA. Shit, I don’t think I have the words for it. The closest thing I can think of is when my sister tried giving my dog vegetarian dog treats. He sniffed them, he kicked them around with his paws. Heck, he might’ve even licked them but one thing he didn’t do was eat them. And in the bigger picture, I think that’s an experience many men have had with places like TGMP. It just didn’t really acknowledge one’s nature or the reality of the situation that most of us face…

Now, I’m a product (victim?) of the American’t Edumacashin sistym (yes, Zorro El Supremo, If you are reading this, I know it’s misspelled, “hipster irony” y’all.) And, uh, lets just say I’ve got a few insecurities about the gaps in my knowledge. I read a whole bunch of books (struggled through, if I’m honest) on a wide range from physics to psychology in an attempt to rectify this. I read a few of Stephen Hawking’s books. He talked about Newtonian physics-still good enough to build a bridge I’ve heard but that’s above my paygrade. Einsteinian physics, Quantum physics… He mentioned that ideally there will eventually be a unified theory that will tie everything together. (And my quickie wiki research shows he doesn’t think that anymore.) Quiet frankly, I think patriarchy and other theories are incomplete and don’t even begin to describe the complexity of reality. Perhaps incomplete theories make ideas easier to understand but it is still oppressive to force reality into the confines of such theories. Perhaps ideologue’s are best avoided…

Doxxed like a motherfucker: the Strange Case of Mattinand Fornimu and other Creepy Tails…

Thanks to MRDA for letting me know that a not nice guy ™ just doxxed himself as the infamous Ferdidnand Bardimu.

So now it’s time I doxx myself…

I’ve been posting as David H. F*cktrelle, Male Feminist Extraordinaire ™ ….

I began this little charade during the IMF days after a creepy male feminist extraordinaire decided to misquote me. So, I had written several articles that I posted at IMF. I suppose this made me unofficialy/officially part of the manosphere, but I was growing disillusioned with the place. As a mutt, or how the WN’s catagorized me, “a victim of miscegenation” I felt discontent with the so-called alter-righties. So I decided to have some fun and start leaving comments under the F*cktrelle handle. A few people thought it was funny but the thin skinned, racist mangina’s enlightened, race realist alter-righties delicate sensibilities were offended and I was told that I’d be banned if I continued. Eventually, Mattinand putt and end to the place. Ironically, Alpha Real Man ™ Paul Elam was ardenetly defending his support of IMF as the voice behind IMF was shitting on MRA’s with a passion that would impress many feminist’s. Infact, it impressed the misquoting male feminist extraordinaire bigot so much that he threw in his support of Fornimu with the addendum that he doesn’t support everything, just a few points…

haha, some shit I just can’t make up…

I’d continue to have some fun for awhile at the expense of Male Feminist Extraordinaire’s and Race Realist HBD lovin’ Neo Nazi’s. There seems to be a fair share of similarity between the two. I suppose that’s what they call “intersectionality” in those indoctrination programs, er, Womyn’s Studies courses…
–just google manboobz/eradica for the 411–

I was dropping so many clues, I was hoping someone would putt 2 and 2 together and figure out that stonerwithaboner was really F*cktrelle but alas, I suppose I wasn’t a big enough figure in the blogsphere…

Eventually I was found out. I’m surprised, the guy didn’t give me a feminist cookie. After all, he takes part of something someone said out of context and then puts his words behind it to change the meaning. I suppose the flashing sarcasm button is enough plausible deniability to avoid libel but I ain’t a lawyer. He said, “I mean, that seems sort of douchey, especially since there are apparently manosphere dudes out there stupid enough to think that it’s me.” I thought he might’ve found it humorous, guess not, cause now I’m banned from his blog. Ya know that bumper sticker that says, “well behaved women rarely make history.” Maybe I’m the penis owning variant of that.

Anyways, I decided to resurrect the F*cktrelle meme and leave a friendly note on the Fornicator’s self-doxxing blog post. I was kinda hoping he’d be all, “Well, yer a jerk and I disagree with you on pretty much everything but you cracked me up a few times so we’re all good.” But alas that wasn’t the case. He deleted my post. Oh, well, I guess I won’t be invited to the next Manosphere of Doom hot tub meet-up where Roosh says consent is an evil feminist plot, Donovan says str8 men need to loosen up and “experiment” and Fornimu says only MRA’s can be raped. Maybe they can invite the efete ginger haired darling of the alternative right, Mr. Rudd to the drunken orgy sweaty, intimate “discourse” on masculinity. Or, maybe Hugo Schwyzer can ad his two inches, er cents…

…women rating men…

a few days back, I posted some of the Dove vids that are going around the blogsphere…

Now of course there was gonna be a parody, what I didn’t realize is there’s more than one.

Via Erudite Knight I saw this…

Now, obviously it is meant for laughs so maybe we can’t draw real life conclusions but…

The first thing I thought of while watching this was a thread from Feminist Critics where they mentioned a trend among Okay Cupid profiles where women found men relatively less attractive.

There are a couple explanations that come to mind…

…one is the old trope that men are success objects and women are sex objects-therefore women may tend to dress better and be more comfortable posing infront of the camera. But those who study metrosexuality may disagree…

…and many who are familiar with the manosphere would mention hypergamy. This graph can be read allot of ways. Some may see it as late teen and early twenties women having their pick. Some may say it suggests men prefer younger women.

Thoughts?

…Elam Screwed the Pooch…

Well, I’ve long said A Voice for Men ain’t this man’s voice…

Over at Genderratic, I stated my worries over that place and it ain’t the first time I’ve had cause for concern. Unfortunately, high status, Mr. Alpha had to go in all guns blazing, and my gut feeling was he was wrong….

stonerwithaboner on 2013-04-21 at 3:44 pm said:

…also,

I saw postings around the manosphere about a conservative feminist blogger denying white men admission to college. In the links, there were a few red flags.

I perused the links and 2 and 2 didn’t add up…

her google + account listed one location, her other blog listed that she wasn’t even in the US and had a far different writing style than the first blog where she talked about denying white men admission. Just from 5 minutes of research, red flags were going off. Either they had two different people confused or someone was trying to smear one person for reasons unknown.

5 minutes of research and the red flags were going off. (and I’m no alpha male with an advanced degree.) Yet those guys go all in. “Shoot first, ask questions later.”

You don’t doxx someone unless you’ve got your shit 100% straight and you are ready to deal with the consequences.

and if they do have the wrong person, that really pisses me off. I donated to the Innocence Project cause the idea of the wrong person getting punished goes against my values.

what more can I fucking say…

—-

turns out I was right.

…sorry to the lady who probably has a way different ideology than me who got needlessly harassed by “human right’s activists”…

…and fatuous Manboobz bigot, I’m not on your side either. Go hang out with Matt Forney, Jack Donovan and all the other efete guys who have to bash low status men because they are unsure of their own masculinity. I’d tell ’em all to suck my dick but those asshats would probably consider it an invitation rather than a figure of speech.

…gender differences via “oppressive beauty standards”…

so I found this vid via Erudite Knight.

Now here’s the parody:

Now look at this video of “Melinda” describing her experience:

Alright, this is all “anecdotal” here…

Look how the men all cut each other down and Melinda says how she feels built up when her sorority sisters say she looks good…

Obviously this is made by advertisers with an agenda…

I don’t know that we can cut any hard and fast rules here, but…

this ties back to something I’ve been thinking for awhile…

The MRA movement is doomed. High status and low status men live in completely separate worlds. Their self interests are many times diametrically opposed. That’s where feminism had their gender analysis very, very wrong. They kept on thinking that men work as a big homogeneous group to keep women oppressed. Nope, not how it works…

….um, like, yeah, like, totally, like tubular says the Rioting Valley Grrrl….

So, I shouldn’t poke fun at a serious matter. I’m an awful human being. I’m much worse than guys who almost kill girlfriends in drug fueled rages. I’m even slightly worse than those evillle oppressive Nice Guys ™ –and since I found this at an alter righties blog, I gotta point out that I’m not that high on the HBD scale. Still, Marcotte says “like” a whole bunch. Makes O’Bombya’s “that’s above my paygrade” comment look smart.

One of the issues that comes up is the born alive rule.

Another that is implied, by mentioning the abortion of down syndrome fetuses is that as technology improves, people will be able to find out a whole ton about their unborn babies. Do you think anyone would abort because they have the wrong eye color, because they won’t have a high IQ, because they are the wrong gender? Oh, wait, that last one already happens. Anyways there was a sci-fi movie I saw that dealt with some of these ideas. Shit, is this still about women’s rights or have we moved into eugenics?

Now this song is kind of cool…

Maybe Amanda can learn a musical instrument and form a band…

Lick That Kitty You Misogynistic Douchebag Redux: Another Sexually Entitled Nice Girl ™

Via Tamen at Feminist Critics.

In this video, comedian Louis CK gets sexually assaulted. Yes, I said sexually assaulted…

Feminist Alyssa Rosenberg had this to say:

“I found myself cheering for her ideas, even though Laurie is awful. She’s aggressive and violent, at one point threatening to break Louie’s finger, at another, bouncing his head off her passenger-side window. And Laurie’s emotionally nasty, too, implying that Louie is gay because he won’t reciprocate sexually. But even if she’s hard to identify with, even if her behavior is embarrassing or horrifying, even if I felt physically uncomfortable watching C.K. give in to her demands, there’s something powerful about the way this episode of Louie threw every possible objection at Laurie, made her as unsympathetic a spokeswoman as possible, and acknowledged that she was right anyway.

As his last hedge against Laurie’s demands, Louie claims that Laurie has suckered him into an unfair bargain. “If you doing that for me hinged on me doing that for you, you should have said something,” he grouses, inadvertently proving her point. Louie’s default assumption is that he can get something he wants without having to give anything up or think about the other person’s needs in return. There’s something refreshing about the blast of rage Laurie sends back to him. “You know how many dicks I sucked that I didn’t want to suck, because I’m a good kid?” she asks, her voice echoing with years of pent-up indignation. Laurie may be a scary, irritating pain. But Louie doesn’t have an answer to her question, or a defense against the accusation that he’s let a lot of women go unsatisfied even as he’s judged them for being attentive to his desires. Once they’re over the shock of Laurie, I doubt anyone in the audience has a good justification for that double standard either.”

So, what would Ms. Rosenberg say about guys who say they are entitled to sex after paying for a date?

Double standards, gotta love ’em…

Someone by the name of Chi left this excellent response in the comments section:

“I’m baffled by the positive response, too. This was clearly depicted as a date rape, and I believe Louis CK did it very purposefully. I even think the final dialog was right on, while pushing the envelope to the comedic edge, because abused people *will* appease an abuser either out of fear or some kind of Stockholm Syndrome. In fact, this may be the most realistic depiction of how acquaintance rape can really go down that I’ve ever seen: You’re having a good time, accept some kind of favor, next comes a demand to”put out” something you didn’t agree to but they feel you “owe,” then threats, then just enough violence to show what they’re capable of, then submission to rape, followed by dazed acceptance of further instructions. It’s brilliant, really, but because the rapist is a woman, people are getting it pretty twisted.”