Avoid anyone into BD&SM

This will not be politically correct but I will share my observations….

BD&SM is a hideout for abusive people and sociopaths…  Whether they call themselves dominatricces, submissives, pain sluts, switches or whatnot.  Also, better off to not be friends with a guy who involves himself in this lifestyle even if he says he just does it just to meet “easy womyn.”  You have been given a red flag just as serious as seeing someone who abuses animals or scams people with bad business deals.  Likely the person engaging in BD&SM also does these things. Someone who hurts animals and pulls scams is likely to hide in the shadows.  But thanks to things like “50 Shades,” these sociopaths now feel safe to drop key warning signs.  You are actually being given a gift now that these people are moving in society less covertly.

You might be a shy, quiet guy who meets a very rare womyn who shows interest in you.  But she reveals she wants something strange, like being choked…  You might have serious issues about wanting to do this but she will push boundaries.  Ironically, she does this after she’s talked about “safe words” and “consent.”  She will insult your masculinity.  It’s better to walk away than to put yourself into a dangerous situation for some second rate pussy.  Never mind the legal consequences (if it gets to that, you’ll be fucked harder than someone tied up in a boyscout outfit by Jack Donovan and the scumbag thugs at the NPI afterparty.)  You’ll face psychological consequences for allowing yourself into being bullied to do things you didn’t want to do.

Now I realize I’ve written in a much more authoritarian tone than I usually do.  If you were to ask me about psychadelic drugs, I’d tell you to read about it and if you had the opportunity to try it in real life, to go for it if you felt the situation was safe and the opportunity for adventure was worth potential risks.  If you asked me about skydiving, I’d tell you something similar.  Now, this advice isn’t aimed at “libertarian MGTOW” or “Red Pillerz” if they even stop by my blog anymore.  They are too arrogant to listen to anyone, even with all the evidence in the universe.  This most certainly isn’t aimed at feminists or M(h)RA’s, many who practice this “lifestyle.”  And, you’ll notice they have abusive personalities.  They constantly seek out fights and portray themselves as “victims.”  It’s a polite warning for an “incel” or guy with poor social skills who might wander into an  extraordinarily dangerous situation.  When your gut is screaming “no” it’s not just social anxiety but a warning to leave.

 

16 thoughts on “Avoid anyone into BD&SM

  1. Well said. This coincides nicely with my own article about why women don’t make good platonic friends: https://boydoesntmeetgirl.wordpress.com/2016/02/21/women-dont-make-good-platonic-friends/

    Incels, et al have what you might call “trust issues”, but opposite of the usual sense — they are too trusting. More specifically, they are not judgmental enough. They are eager to suspend common sense and give the benefit of the doubt to people whom they shouldn’t. A lot of times, they’ve been raised to understand that their own trust is something that other people are entitled to, not something that has to be earned, and so they dole it out to everyone and only withdraw it when it is violated, if that.

    But as I said in my blog, incels are at a crippling disadvantage regarding experience, and that lack of experience sticks out like a sore thumb to women. I would say that chances are, any woman they’d draw in is going to be exactly the kind who will turn on him. BDSM is a massive red flag for that, but I would even go so far as to say that simply showing interest in him alone is a red flag. There are those who will say that I’m cynical and bitter, but hey, my experience speaks louder to me than my critics.

    1. one thing semi-related to your article…

      when I tried online dating, I thought I was going to get no interest. What happened was that there were a handful of women who would talk to me and reply to my messages. I mistook this as “interest” and would then ask if they wanted to meet for coffee. At this point, they would get scarce or block me. I explained this to a man who is very experienced with woman and has played in a rock band, toured, partied hard. He told me that it’s simple. What these broads do is they get the emotional validation that in times past a husband would’ve provided. They use social media for the emotional end of a relationship.

      Also had the experience of some feminist/liberal womyn with her high paying cahrear trying to “befriend” me. When I blew her off, it was funny how infuriated she was that a low status male snubbed her. She’s really trashy though. She’ll drive drunk and realize that she can play the woman card and pour on the crocodile tears in the rare event the pigs pull her over. Even an older lady complained about how trashy her behavior is.

      It’s been difficult to explain, I almost wish I looked like Matt Forney because then people would have the attitude of “be a bitter, ugly man and just have sex with prostitutes.” If you are somewhat okay looking or reasonably fit, people expect you to stay in the game. Ironically it’s not that I get no female attention, it’s almost if there is a mark on my head and abusive womyn smell prey the way a pirhanna does. I avoided relationships for my psychological well being but most people would look at me like I am a lunatic…

  2. I tell you, I have seen so many other men — myself included — testify to this same exact scenario. Women can detect a man’s inexperience and vulnerability, and all but the 99% who have no use for him whatsoever will engage him, only for the purpose of being an emotional parasite until it’s time to throw him overboard. It’s at that point you realize that you’ve been playing the very useful role of an beta male emotional provider (BMEP) and getting nothing in return, and the ease with which she discards you at that time leaves no doubt about it. Few things make a guy feel more like a chump than that.

  3. The “power” all these BDSM “Masters” have doesn’t mean shit in the grand scheme of things anyway. I always compare them to dogs that look threatening, that are big and that bark but that are actually castrated, housebroken and on the leash of a woman. The actual power lies in the hands of the woman holding the leash.

    The actual power lies in the hands of the woman who snaps her fingers once to let a man perform as a “Master” in the bedroom, then snaps her fingers again to turn him into an obedient feminist. If you google you’ll find THOUSANDS of articles about feminists who are “confident enough to be both a feminist and a BDSM submissive” and whose “Masters” are also feminists.

    They wear choking collars for “Daddy” while writing about “rape culture” and “man spreading” on tumblr. Probably some sort of compensation for feminism: the more feminist our societies get, the more women want to be abused and dominated in the bedroom.

    It’s interesting tho, that with men it seems to be like 50/50, some men want to be dominant, some men want to be dominatED. But women are exclusively “submissive”, while all the dominant women seem to prostitutes who are in it for the money.

    Maybe this is because there is generally more variability among men (the funny comedians all male, the super serious preachers and depressed poets also male; the great artists all male, the stupid “reading is for faggots” dudebros also mostly male, the geniuses male, the low-IQ dsylexia folks also mostly male, etc.) or maybe because men seem to be able to fetishize almost everything: some men fetishize fat women, but who has ever heard of a woman preferring small men? Some men have a fetish for getting humiliated about the size of their dick, some men have an actual sexual FETISH over the idea of being reduced to a beta-provide while the “Chad” (“Bull”) fucks their wive. So for many men it seems to be a coping mechanism, I suppose.

    1. I think I read on Maggie McNeil that she would dom men but be disgusted by them.

      https://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2010/09/17/bdsm-part-three/

      However, there are probably more than a few dominatrixes who are sociopaths and enjoy being able to abuse someone who was foolish enough to allow themselves to be tied up…

      “some men have an actual sexual FETISH over the idea of being reduced to a beta-provide while the “Chad” (“Bull”) fucks their wive.”

      I’ve always wondered if these guys were secretly gay. Most of my (very limited) sexual experience came from when I was a bartender at a “social club.” Guys would ask if I liked their wives. I’d say yup, then we would get a room. Sometimes the guy would be a “porn director.”
      But the guy would be furiously masturbating while I did his wife/girlfriend. The other situation was that it would be an older man/younger woman and the lady would play and the guy would watch. Usually in this situation, the guy wouldn’t initiate. I’m guessing this was because the guy was impotent but let the wife play. Anyways, as a bartender, I was treated better than most the single guys who paid hefty door fees to attend the party but still treated awfully. I suppose like a seargant in the army. Very low on the totem pole but there are guys eating worse crap…

      1. ” Probably some sort of compensation for feminism: the more feminist our societies get, the more women want to be abused and dominated in the bedroom.”

        What do you mean by “compensation” exactly? Compensation … how?

  4. As you know, ‘cuck’ is the new ‘fag’ in some places of the internet. I don’t think that cuck fetishists are faggots in the sense of ‘gay’. There’s maybe something else. They’re getting off at someone else doing the work for them. Are such men on the same level like guys who fap to lesbo porn? At least, the overlap here is that they don’t have to do anything about the sexual action.

    As for red flags, I think that for example scammers deliberately put them up to sort out the idiots who in their view don’t derserve better. Probably, the less sociopathic fraudsters calm their conscience with this method, too.

    A relationship wouldn’t be a thing for me either. I just love my loneliness too much and furthermore, considering how much my friends complain about their chicks, it’s really not worth the hassle. Hell, I’ll never understand those handsome guys who settle for a fattie. Those dudes are miserable as fuck. I’d rather die a virgin than even kiss a hambeast.

    Two question to you, Stoner:

    Those guys who are on the lower end of the food chain in those swinger bars, they won’t become regulars, won’t they?

    How old on average are the women who frequented the place at which you’ve worked as a bartender?

    1. Those guys who are on the lower end of the food chain in those swinger bars, they won’t become regulars, won’t they?

      Surprisingly some do become regulars. But there are allot of new guys who try it once and never again, hence many places like this have reputations as clip joints.

      How old on average are the women who frequented the place at which you’ve worked as a bartender?

      I would say the average age for women are just over 40. Sometimes there would be some 20-something beauties, but they were somewhat rare and single women are called “unicorns.” Every night was different, one evening I thought would be a bust wasn’t. Most guys left and some broads came from bridesmaids party….

  5. you’ll be fucked harder than someone tied up in a boyscout outfit by Jack Donovan and the scumbag thugs at the NPI afterparty.

    This made me laugh out loud.

    being choked

    All women are like that …

  6. “But thanks to things like “50 Shades,” these sociopaths now feel safe to drop key warning signs. You are actually being given a gift now that these people are moving in society less covertly.”

    That’s what promotion of deviant behaviour hitting the mainstream is about. It doesn’t pervert normal people, like some Christers or other tradcons might suggest. The thing is that genuine perverts just feel much more safe to reveal their preferences.

    1. I don’t really do blogrolls, I technically have a blogroll (ironic too if you look at the links)–but if I was gonna do that I’d have shedding of the ego and omega virgin revolt cause I posted there allot but then I’d be accused of being in 100% agreement which I’m not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s