#mepoop

Okay, I’ve been reluctant to write anything about the #mepoop hastag because as everyone knows arguing with feminists is absolutely futile.  (Although making memes is good for a laugh and sometimes someone tells someone that the “source material” saw the meme I made and wound up highly offended.)

I’m also reluctant to write anything about when a man kills himself because everyone wants to erase whatever suffering he must’ve been going through and tag on their extraordinairily condescending political statement…

….however, look at this letter by the no talent hacks Rose McGowan and Asia Argento…

http://time.com/5308196/rose-mcgowan-anthony-bourdain-suicide-asia-argento/

“But here’s the thing, over their time together, thankfully, she did the work to get help, so she could stay alive and live another day for her and her children. Anthony’s depression didn’t let him, he put down his armor, and that was very much his choice. His decision, not hers. His depression won.”

Sounds allot like “pull yerself up by dem bootstraps, little man.  So I guess now feminists are eating from the same bowl of tough guy crap as those libertarians on MGTOW blogs…

“Anthony and Asia had a free relationship, they loved without borders of traditional relationships, and they established the parameters of their relationship early on. Asia is a free bird, and so was Anthony.”

Uh, is this the politically correct way to say they were “swingers?” Too bad, we can only ask on of ’em what the bounds of the relationshit were.  The other one mighta had a very different idea floating around in his head.

“We are asking you to be better, to look deeper, to read and learn about mental illness, suicide and depression before you make it worse for survivors by judging that which we do not understand, that which can never fully be understood.”

Is this double speak for ‘Absolve me of ALL responsibility.  Maybe I abused the dude, mocked his masculinity.  Demanded that he be a “perfect ally” but not have any of his needs on the table.  Remember, dudes are the predator class and us precious womyn the vyctym class.  Even when a dude up and kills himself, it is womyn who are the vycyms.  IT is alsways womyn who are the vyctyms.  Queen Hillary got it gosh darn right when she said womyn are the primary vyctyms of war.’

Somehow, this slop does not read like the words of a grieving lover.  More like the words of a slimy politician trying to evade responsibilty.  What was that phrase sanitized for tv so we wouldn’t question the bloodlust of the Whitehouse?  “Collateral Damage?”  Well, goddamnit and fuck, I guess this is just #2 in “Collateral Damage” for the #MePoop (bowel) movement…

If there is anything to be learned from this sad lose of life, I would say Don’t be an “Ally.”  Leave the door open when talking to women and even men these days so no false accusations can occur.  Be forthright and honest in all business dealings.  Have hard boundaries (ie “Do NOT mix business and pleasure because you are NOT James Bond Muthafucker!) Fight false accusations aggressively.  Do NOT trust liars and grifters.

4 thoughts on “#mepoop

  1. So, here we have Rose McGowan’s unsolicited public pubic blathering about Anthony Bourdain killing himself.

    Literally WTF? Or is it that confusing?

    Pretty obvious what’s goin on when we consider the facts and changing contexts.

    What motivates this whore? More specifically, why is this slut concerned in the slightest about what the public may or may not think about it and why is she “defending” Asia and specifically from what? How did Anthony Bourdain’s suicide activate Rose McGowan’s yeast?

    “… they loved without borders of traditional relationships, and they established the parameters of their relationship early on.” Isn’t this exactly the same thing Rose McGowan and Harvey Weinstein did and both maintained for years until very recently? Why is McGowan applying “borders” in one context and time period but not in others?

    Delusional or not, McGowan apparently assumes (or wants others to assume) that Asia is blamed for Bourdain’s depression and suicide. Or does she? Is she alluding to blame or assigning power? McGowan’s defense of Asia can only be based on the assignment (potential or not) that Bourdain’s suicide is somehow the result of Asia’s relationship with another man. She frames their relationship as “free” in a preemptive scam to pre-excuse Asia of any “blame”. McGowan allowed Weinstein, and god knows how many others, the same “freedom” with her…..until very recently. Interesting how she allowed that freedom as long as it was advantageous to her and now disallows because it no longer serves her. Now its disallowance serves her. Kind of interesting how this works. Right?

    Although she mentions it, McGowan detracts from the fact that Bourdain had a long history of depression and dropped many hints of suicidal inclinations (including on his show) for decades before he even met Asia. Is McGowan hitch hiking on Bourdain’s depression and suicide by implying Asia’s relationship with another man was the pivotal cause, the trigger? What does this tell us about McGowan regard of her own sexuality and that of women in general? Does McGowan really think her vagina and ass (or any woman’s) are so powerful (and in effect women are so entitled) that they can unintentionally cause or trigger the death of such an influential man as Bourdain, or any man for that matter? What may this tell us about Rose McGowan’s relationship with Harvey Weinstein and what she did with him and is now doing to him?

  2. Stoner, so you think we should give priority to weak guys?

    I think we are all “tough guys” to some degree or other in this life. So it makes sense to adopt the mindset of one, if only to maintain sanity.

    1. Incel PUA, is that you buddy???

      While I personally would not trust a psychiatrist/psychologist to solve my problems and would essentially be “pulling myself up by the bootstraps” –I though the Argento/McGowan manifesto was hypocritical. One thing depressed people have difficulty doing is seeking help and doing the work for self care. In one circumstance they would cry “vyctym blaming” and in another circumstance, they essentially say that a man had to “pull himself up by the bootstraps.” Since society DOES NOT care about men, then, yes in the most literal sense we have to be “tough guys” who pull ourselves up by the bootstraps. But I will not stop pointing out the hypocrisy of liberals, feminists, M(h)RA’s and Miggytoes….

      1. “Incel PUA, is that you buddy???”

        Damn you are right on this one stoner. Change of image as they say. I wish to reflect the popular opinion about me in my title.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s